Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                    Date: 20030828

                                                              Docket: IMM-6020-02

                                                           Citation: 2003 FC 1005

                                         

Between:

                    CLAUDIA VERONICA ALONSO MARTINEZ

                                                                Applicant

                                 - and -

                      THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER

PINARD J.:

[1]    This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the "IRB") dated November 4, 2002, that the applicant is not a Convention refugee within the meaning of section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the "Act"), or a "person in need of protection" under section 97 of the Act.

[2]    The applicant is a citizen of Mexico. She claims to have a well-founded fear of persecution in her country because of her membership in a particular social group, i.e., because she is a lesbian.

[3]    The IRB determined as follows:

The panel determines that Claudia Veronica Alonso Martinez is not a person in need of protection since she has an internal flight alternative in Mexico.


[4]    Although the IRB found the applicant credible, it gave the following reasons in support of its decision:

-     given that the applicant did not claim refugee protection during her trip to Europe, she did not have the least fear of persecution in Mexico. From October 2000 through January 19, 2002, the applicant did not have any problems resulting from her homosexuality;

-     the documents regarding the general status of homosexuals in Mexico establish that there are good relations between lesbians and heterosexuals in the Federal District, i.e. Mexico City;

-     the applicant based her claim for refugee protection on the fact that she is lesbian and that in the Federal District of Mexico she fears persecution because of the high crime rate and not because of her sexual orientation;

-     thus, the Federal District is an internal flight alternative where the applicant can live without fear of persecution on account of her homosexuality.

[5]    The findings of the panel, based on both documentary evidence and the applicant's own testimony, seem to me to satisfy the relevant law in matters involving internal flight, as clarified by the Federal Court of Appeal in Thirunavukkarasu v. Canada (M.E.I.), [1994] 1 F.C. 589, at page 597:

Thus, the IFA must be sought, if it is not unreasonable to do so, in the circumstances of the individual claimant. This test is a flexible one, that takes into account the particular situation of the claimant and the particular country involved. This is an objective test and the onus of proof rests on the claimant on this issue, just as it does with all other aspects of a refugee claim. Consequently, if there is a safe haven for claimants in their own country, where they would be free of persecution, they are expected to avail themselves of it unless they can show that it is objectively unreasonable for them to do so.

[6]    I need only point out that the IRB has offered ample documentary evidence to prove the existence of initiatives and support organizations for homosexuals experiencing problems in the Federal District. The objective documentary evidence also demonstrates that other remedies are available from various government departments for situations involving discrimination. Finally, it appears that the applicant is more fearful of crime in the Federal District of Mexico than she is of being persecuted because of her sexual orientation.


[7]    For the foregoing reasons, the application for judicial review is dismissed.

"Yvon Pinard"

                                                                         

JUDGE

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

August 28, 2003

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB


                                   FEDERAL COURT

                    NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                         IMM-6020-02

STYLE OF CAUSE:                 CLAUDIA VERONICA ALONSO MARTINEZ v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:        Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:         July 9, 2003

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard

DATED:                    August 28, 2003

APPEARANCES:

Manuel Centurion              FOR THE APPLICANT

Suzon Létourneau              FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Manuel Centurion              FOR THE APPLICANT

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg              FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.