Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020618

Docket: T-2185-01

Neutral citation:     2002 FCT 686

EDMONTON, ALBERTA, TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2002.

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROULEAU            

BETWEEN:

H. JOANNE JOHNSON

                                                                                                                                                          Plaintiff

- and -

THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE (R.C.M.P.)

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER; R.C.M.P. K. DIVISION

(EDMONTON, ALBERTA), W. SWEENY, AND JOHN DOE

                                                                                                                                                    Defendants

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

ROULEAU, J.:

[1]                 The matter came before me at Edmonton on Tuesday, June 18, 2002.


[2]                 The Plaintiff requested that because of her lack of ability in complex legal matters that she be represented by a gentleman, Mr. Antonio Dy-Reyes, who is not a member of the bar. I was advised that the same request was submitted to Justice Kelen in February of 2002 at which time she was advised to file a formal motion submitting such a request. None was forth coming.

[3]                 The matter then turned to the issues: Re plaintiff seeking mandamus, the defendant opposing such a motion until such time as the Court has had an opportunity to determine his motion to strike which would test the validity of the relief claimed by the plaintiff.

[4]                 The plaintiff, since her last appearance, filed an Amended Statement of Claim.

[5]                 The Court determined that it should entertain the Defendant's motion to strike before any other issues could be resolved.

                                                                            ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

[6]                 The notice of motion on behalf of the Plaintiff, filed the 4th day of January, 2002, pursuant to Rule 371 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, for an Order for Mandamus, and such further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just be adjourned sine die.

[7]                 The Defendant shall serve and file an Amended Statement of Defence within 10 days of the date of this Order.

[8]                 The Defendant shall further file its motion record by July 18, 2002, and should be prepared to challenge the original as well as the Amended Statement of Claim.

[9]                 The Plaintiff shall file her motion record by August 1, 2002. Regardless as to whether or not her reply record contains all material, the Court shall accept all of the documents already in the Court file as part of her motion record in light of her lack of legal training.

[10]            The matter of the application by the Defendant to strike this action and seek summary judgment shall proceed peremptorily on August 6, 2002.

           "P. Rouleau"                      

   Judge


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 TRIAL DIVISION

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

    

DOCKET:                                             T-2185-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Joanne Johnson v. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police

et al.

  

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Edmonton, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                       18-JUN-2002

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: The Honourable Mr. Justice Rouleau

DATED:                                                18-JUN-2002

   

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Joanne Johnson                                                                       FOR PLAINTIFF

Mr. Bruce Hughson                                                                        FOR DEFENDANTS

  

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Joanne Johnson

Self Represented                                                                            FOR PLAINTIFF

Morris Rosenberg                                                                           FOR DEFENDANTS

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.