Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020606

Docket: IMM-4639-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 648

BETWEEN:

SANTIAGO MANUEL MERLOS,

MARTHA BEATRIZ CASTILLO DE MERLOS,

FLORENCIA TAMARA MERLOS, MAXIMILIANO ANDRES MERLOS

                                                                                                                                                       Applicants

                                                                                 and

THE MINISTER

OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

LUTFY A.C.J.

[1]                 The applicants, a married couple and their two children who are all citizens of Argentina, have not established any reviewable error in the decision of the Convention Refugee Determination Division that they are not Convention refugees. The claim of Manuel Merlos is based on his fear


  

of persecution for publicly challenging the hierarchy of his labour co-operative for alleged corruption and fraudulent practices.

[2]                 Neither the documentary information nor the transcript of the refugee hearing supports the applicants' argument that the single member panel mischaracterized, misinterpreted or ignored the evidence.

[3]                 Mr. Merlos acknowledged during his testimony that neither his personal documents (Exhibit C-6) nor the newspaper articles he relied upon disclosed any threat of harm against him. The applicant's admission and a review of the record support the panel's conclusion that the documents "do not specifically apply to the claimant."

[4]                 The single alleged incident of a threat of physical harm against Mr. Merlos would have occurred some three weeks prior to the applicants' arrival in Canada and some two months before he signed his personal information form, which made no reference to this allegation. Upon my review of the transcript, it was open to the tribunal to conclude that this omission undermined the credibility of Mr. Merlos and that "... the claimant fabricated a story based on membership in the [labour co-operative] in order to support a refugee claim based on membership in a particular social group."

  

[5]                 The applicants have demonstrated no error in the decision under review, let alone one that is patently unreasonable.

[6]                 This application for judicial review will be dismissed. Neither party suggested the certification of a serious question.

   

                                                                                                                                                    "Allan Lutfy"                     

line

                                                                                                                                                            A.C.J.                          

Toronto, Ontario

June 6, 2002


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                                                                     IMM-4639-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                         SANTIAGO MANUEL MERLOS,

MARTHA BEATRIZ CASTILLO DE MERLOS, FLORENCIA TAMARA MERLOS, MAXIMILIANO ANDRES MERLOS

                                                                Applicants

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                         Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                      THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 2002

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY                  LUTFY A.C.J.

DATED:                                 THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 2002

APPEARANCES BY:                   Mr. Daniel Fine

For the Applicants

Mr. Robert Bafaro

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Daniel Fine

Barrister and Solicitor                                                                                                     4950 Yonge Street, Suite 190

Box 174

                                                                                          Toronto, Ontario

M2N 6K1

For the Applicants

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                      Date: 20020606

                                                         Docket: IMM-4369-01

BETWEEN:

SANTIAGO MANUEL MERLOS,

MARTHA BEATRIZ CASTILLO DE MERLOS, FLORENCIA TAMARA MERLOS, MAXIMILIANO ANDRES MERLOS

Applicants

- and -

                                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                         Respondent

                                                                         

                                                   

REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                   

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.