Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20030408

                                                                                                                               Docket: IMM-1720-03

Montréal, Quebec, April 8, 2003

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROULEAU

BETWEEN:

CAMIL HANA HADDAD

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

Motion by the applicant for a stay of execution of the removal order scheduled for April 15, 2003.

ORDER

The application is dismissed.

                          "Paul Rouleau"

                                  Judge

Certified true translation

Suzanne Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.


Date: 20030408

                                    Docket: IMM-1720-03

Neutral Citation: 2003 FCT 405

BETWEEN:

CAMIL HANA HADDAD

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER

ROULEAU J.

[1]         This is a motion for a stay of execution of a removal order issued against the applicant; an application for leave attacking a negative decision by the pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) officer dated February 4, 2003.

[2]         The applicant, a citizen of Lebanon, was notified that he would be removed to the United States April 15, 2003.


[3]         When he arrived in Canada from the United States in May 2000, he requested asylum on the basis of his political opinions as a mechanic within the South Lebanon Army (SLA). The application for refugee status was rejected in May 2002 for lack of credibility. He has not filed any application for leave and judicial review of this decision with the Court.

[4]         In May 2002, an application to the pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) program was filed. And on September 9, 2002, the applicant also filed an application for humanitarian considerations with risks.

[5]         On September 11, 2002, he was summonsed to the offices of Citizenship and Immigration Canada and was given 30 days in which to supply new observations in support of his allegations in the PRRA application. A decision was made February 4, 2003, in the absence of any new observations; a negative decision on the PRRA application.

[6]         The same officer then examined the humanitarian considerations request and the request for an exemption was not granted.

[7]         The applicant argues that there is an apprehension of bias because the same officer processed the request for a visa exemption for humanitarian considerations and the PRRA application.

[8]         This argument cannot be advanced without proof. Moreover, this Court has held that a decision-maker who assesses risks twice in a particular case does not by this fact alone demonstrate bias.


[9]         The applicant shall be removed to the United States. No material evidence shows that he will be sent to Lebanon, an allegation that is purely speculative.

[10]       The case law of this Court has on many occasions held that a removal to the United States, with potential removal from there to one's country of origin, does not constitute irreparable harm.

[11]       The serious question cited by the applicant is based on the submission that the same officer made two decisions - and this argument has already been rejected. The decisions were made in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness. Moreover, the applicant had an opportunity to present written observations, and did not do so.

[12]       The balance of convenience weighs in favour of the Minister. Absent irreparable harm and serious questions, there is no need for the Court to assess this criterion.

[13]       The application is dismissed.

                          "Paul Rouleau"

                                  Judge

Montréal, Quebec

April 8, 2003

Certified true translation

Suzanne Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20030408

                                                 Docket: IMM-1720-03

Before:

CAMIL HANA HADDAD

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET NO:                         IMM-1720-02

STYLE:                                     

CAMIL HANA HADDAD

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:         Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:            April 7, 2003

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROULEAU

DATED:                                   April 8, 2003

APPEARANCES:

Anthony Karkar                                                                             FOR THE APPLICANT

Patricia Deslauriers                                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Anthony Karkar                                                                             FOR THE APPLICANT

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.