Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Docket: IMM-2729-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 561

CALGARY, Alberta, Tuesday, the 14th day of May, 2002.

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL

BETWEEN:

                                                             THUAN PHUOC TRINH

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

                                                                              - and -

                                THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL, J.:

[1]                 In the present case, the Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (AD) rejected an appeal of a visa officer's refusal to grant the Applicant husband's sponsorship application of his wife who lives in Viet Nam. The refusal and rejection was based on a finding that the marriage was not bona fide.

[2]                 he Appeal Division correctly found that the test to be applied under s. 4(3) of the Immigration Act Regulations, 1978 is whether the marriage was entered into primarily for the purpose of gaining the wife's admission to Canada as a member of the family class and not with the intention on her part of residing permanently with the Applicant.

[3]                 With respect to the first leg of the test, the AD found material discrepancies within the evidence of the Applicant and his spouse and, on this basis, made the determination that the marriage was entered into for a wrongful purpose. My concern does not lie with respect to this determination, but with its use on the second leg of the test.

[4]                 The AD found that a determination on the second leg can be inferred from the evidence on the issues considered on the first leg of the test. The Applicant argues that, while such an inference can be made, nevertheless, the determination on both legs of the test must be made with regard to the totality of the evidence. I agree with this submission. In the present case ample evidence was supplied to the AD of significant contact between the husband and wife both before and after the visa officer's refusal. It is apparent from the AD's decision that no meaningful consideration was given to this evidence. In my opinion, this failure constitutes a reviewable error.

                                                                                   


                                                                             ORDER

[5]                 Accordingly, I set aside the Appeal Division's decision referred to this matter to a different panel for redetermination.

                                                                                                                                  "Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                           JUDGE

Calgary, Alberta

May 14, 2002


                                                                                                

                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20020514

Docket: IMM-2729-01

BETWEEN:

                                                                          THUAN PHUOC TRINH

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                                           - and -


                                                               THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                                                                              & IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                           REASONS FOR_ORDER AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                            


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-2729-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        THUAN PHUOC TRINH v. THE MINISTER

OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  CALGARY, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                    May 14, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER & ORDER :        CAMPBELL, J.

DATED:                                                             May 14, 2002


APPEARANCES:

Mrs. Roxanne Haniff-Darwent                                                                  FOR APPLICANT

Mr. W. Brad Hardstaff                                                                               FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mrs. Roxanne Haniff-Darwent

Calgary, Alberta                                                                                          FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                  FOR RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.