Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20030814

Docket: T-33-03

Citation: 2003 FC 980

BETWEEN:

RICHARD CONDO

Applicant

and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

FRANÇOIS PILON

Assessment Officer

[1]        As the applicant filed a discontinuance of his application for judicial review on March 6, 2003, the respondent is entitled to his costs under the provisions of Rule 402. On May 7, 2003, Sébastien Gagné, counsel for the Department of Justice, filed the respondent's bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. As the applicant has made no written submissions within the deadlines specified by the Registry, we will proceed with assessment of the said bill.


[2]        Assessable services under items 5 and 6 and the services rendered under items 25 and 26 are awarded. Additionally, the photocopying costs claimed for the entering of the respondent's motion in the record seem to be reasonable as well.

[3]        The respondent's costs will accordingly be assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,825.00. A certificate by the assessment officer will be issued for this amount.

"François Pilon"

line

Assessment Officer

Halifax, Nova Scotia

August 14, 2003

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE No.:                                                         T-33-03

BETWEEN:                                                                     RICHARD CONDO

Applicant

-and-

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT:                                        Halifax, Nova Scotia

REASONS BY: FRANÇOIS PILON, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

DATE OF REASONS:                                                  August 14, 2003

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Diane Megas                                                                      for the applicant

Ottawa, Ontario

Morris Rosenberg                                                              for the respondent

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.