Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20030207

Docket: IMM-2015-02

Neutral citation: 2003 FCT 137

CALGARY, Alberta, Friday, the 7th day of February, 2003.

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL

BETWEEN:

                                                       SYED FAYYAZ AHMED SHAH

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

                                                                              - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                 This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the Convention Refugee Determination Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the "CRDD"), dated April 24, 2002, wherein the CRDD determined that the Applicant is not a Convention Refugee.

[2]                 The Applicant, who is a citizen of Pakistan, is a resident of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. He claimed a well-founded fear of persecution from Pakistani authorities on the basis of participation in the United Kashmiri Peoples National Party (UKPNP), a political party seeking the independence of Kashmir.   

[3]                 The CRDD denied the Applicant's claim because of his poor performance as a witness. The CRDD made a negative credibility finding on the basis of the Applicant's inability to respond, as expected, to questions about the political and social nature of the organization to which he belonged. Indeed, because of his good service, the Applicant held the title of "information secretary" with the UKPNP. As a consequence, the CRDD expected a certain level of performance from the Applicant because he held this position.

[4]                 Relying heavily on this underlying consideration, the CRDD described the Applicant's evidence as "vague", "evasive", and given with "reticence"; his knowledge of Pakistan and Kashmir current affairs as "weak"; some of his answers to be "odd and perplexing"; and some of his evidence as "inherently suspect" (Decision, pp. 3-4). In my opinion, the problem with reaching these conclusions is that nowhere in the decision does the CRDD state the evidentiary baseline against which the Applicant and his evidence is compared; assumptions, which might very well be erroneous, cannot support the factual findings made.

  

OR D E R

Accordingly, the CRDD's decision is set aside and the matter referred back for

redetermination by a differently constituted panel.

                                                                                                                                  "Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                           JUDGE     

Calgary, Alberta

February 7, 2003


                                                                                                

                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20030207

Docket: IMM-2015-02

BETWEEN:

                                                                    SYED FAYYAZ AHMED SHAH

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                                           - and -


                                                                                                

                                                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

                                                                                 IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                            


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-2015-02

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        SYED FAYYAZ AHMED SHAH v. MCI

                                                                                                

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  CALGARY, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                    February 7, 2003

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER : CAMPBELL, J.

DATED:                                                             February 7, 2003

APPEARANCES:


Mr. Birjinder P. S. Mangat                                                                     FOR APPLICANT

Ms. Tracy King                                                                                         FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Birjinder P. S. Mangat

Calgary, Alberta                                                                                       FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada           FOR RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.