Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20240307


Docket: T-316-22

Citation: 2024 FC 36

Ottawa, Ontario, March 7, 2024

PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Mosley

BETWEEN:

CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA

Intervener

AMENDED JUDGMENT

UPON an Application for Judicial Review pursuant to section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, RSC 1985, c F-7 (Federal Courts Act) in respect of the Proclamation Declaring a Public Order Emergency, SOR/2022-20 (Proclamation), made pursuant to s. 17(1) of the Emergencies Act, RSC 1985, c 22 (4th Supp.) (the Act) and regulations made pursuant to s. 19(1) of the Act: the Emergency Measures Regulations, P.C. 2022-107, SOR/2022-21 (Regulations), and the Emergency Economic Measures Order, P.C. 2022-108, SOR/2022-22 (Order);

AND UPON the motion of the Respondent to strike the application for judicial review on the grounds that it was moot as the Proclamation had been revoked and the associated Regulations and Order had been terminated by operation of law and that the Applicant lacked standing to challenge the Proclamation, Regulations and Order as they were not directly affected by them within the meaning of subsection 18.1(1) of the Federal Courts Act;

AND UPON considering the material filed by the parties and hearing the oral arguments of Counsel at a hearing in the City of Ottawa, Ontario on April 3-5, 2023;

AND UPON considering that the wording of subsection 18.1 (1) of the Federal Courts Act is broad enough to encompass applicants when they meet the test for public interest standing;

AND UPON determining that while the application is moot, the Court should exercise its discretion to hear it and that the Applicant has satisfied the test to be granted public interest standing;

AND UPON determining that the decision to issue the Proclamation and the associated Regulations and Order was unreasonable and ultra vires the Act;

AND UPON determining that the Regulations infringed section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982 adopted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982, 1982, c 11 (UK) (Charter) and that the Order infringed section 8 of the Charter and that neither infringement was justified under section 1 of the Charter;

THIS COURT ORDERS that:

  1. The Respondent’s motion for an order striking the application for judicial review is denied and the Court exercises its discretion to determine the matter notwithstanding that it is moot in view of the revocation of the Proclamation and termination of the associated Regulations and Order;

  2. The Applicant is granted public interest standing to bring this application for judicial review;

  3. It is declared that the decision to issue the Proclamation and the associated Regulations and Order was unreasonable and ultra vires the Emergencies Act;

  4. It is declared that the Regulations infringed section 2 (b) of the Charter and declared that the Order infringed section 8 of the Charter and that neither infringement was justified under section 1; and

  5. There is no award of costs.

"Richard G. Mosley"

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

T-316-22

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

April 3-5, 2023

 

JUDGMENT:

MOSLEY J.

 

DATED:

January 23, 2024

 

AMENDED:

MARCH 7, 2024

APPEARANCES:

Brandon Chung

Ewa Krajewska

For The ApplicantS

 

Christopher Rupar

John Provart

David Aaron

Kathleen Kohlman

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Henein Hutchison Robitaille LLP

Toronto, Ontario

For The ApplicantS

 

Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.