Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20150121


Docket: A-367-13

Citation: 2015 FCA 15

CORAM:

NOËL C.J.

SCOTT J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

TEQUILA CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V.

Appellant

and

EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO,

TRADING ALSO AS CUBATABACO AND

CORPORATION HABANOS S.A.

Respondents

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 21, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 21, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NOËL C.J.

 

 


Date: 20150121


Docket: A-367-13

Citation: 2015 FCA 15

CORAM:

NOËL C.J.

SCOTT J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

TEQUILA CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V.

Appellant

and

EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO,

TRADING ALSO AS CUBATABACO AND

CORPORATION HABANOS S.A.

Respondents

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 21, 2015).

NOËL C.J.

[1]               Although the appellant in its Memorandum of Fact and Law has raised numerous grounds of appeal, it became apparent during the hearing that the only contention is that the Federal Court judge erred in her appreciation of the evidence.

[2]               We are satisfied that no such error has been committed.

[3]               The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

“Marc Noël”

Chief Justice

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-367-13

APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE SNIDER DATED OCTOBER 4, 2013, DOCKET NO. T-1867-08

STYLE OF CAUSE:

TEQUILA CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V. v. EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO, TRADING ALSO AS CUBATABACO AND, CORPORATION HABANOS S.A.

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

January 21, 2015

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NOËL C.J.

SCOTT J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NOËL C.J.

APPEARANCES:

Chantal Bertosa

 

For The Appellant

 

Jonathan Roch

 

For The Respondents

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

SHAPIRO COHEN

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Appellant

 

MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Respondents

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.