Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20150423


Docket: A-411-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 106

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

DAWSON J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

NOV DOWNHOLE EURASIA LIMITED AND

DRECO ENERGY SERVICES ULC

 

Appellants

and

TLL OILFIELD CONSULTING LTD. AND

 ACURA MACHINE INC.

 

Respondents

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on April 23, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 23, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

 


Date: 20150423


Docket: A-411-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 106

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

DAWSON J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

NOV DOWNHOLE EURASIA LIMITED AND

DRECO ENERGY SERVICES ULC

 

Appellants

and

TLL OILFIELD CONSULTING LTD. AND

 ACURA MACHINE INC.

Respondents

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 23, 2015).

NADON J.A.

[1]               We have not been persuaded that we ought to interfere with the Judge’s decision setting aside the Prothonotary’s decision to strike paragraphs 25 to 27 and the words “and/or void” in paragraph 31 of the Respondents’ Amended Statement of Defence and Counterclaim.

[2]               The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs.

“M. Nadon”

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-411-14

STYLE OF CAUSE:

NOV DOWNHOLE EURASIA LIMITED AND DRECO ENERGY SERVICES ULC v. TLL OILFIELD CONSULTING LTD. AND ACURA MACHINE INC.

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

April 23, 2015

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

DAWSON J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Christopher J. Kvas

William D. Regan

For The Appellants

Bruce W. Stratton

Nikolas S. Purcell

For The Respondents

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

PIASETZKI NENNIGER KVAS LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Appellants

DIMOCK STRATTON LLP

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondents

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.