Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20150928


Dockets: A-312-14

A-313-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 208

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

Docket: A-312-14

BETWEEN:

JOHN DI MAURO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-313-14

AND BETWEEN:

DEBORA DO COUTO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 28, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 28, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

GAUTHIER J.A.

 


Date: 20150928


Dockets: A-312-14

A-313-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 208

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

 

Docket: A-312-14

BETWEEN:

JOHN DI MAURO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-313-14

AND BETWEEN:

DEBORA DO COUTO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 28, 2015).

GAUTHIER J.A.

[1]               John Di Mauro and Debora Do Couto appeal the Order of Justice Diane Campbell of the Tax Court of Canada striking out their Fresh Amended Notices of Appeal dated April 11, 2014 together with all prior Notices of Appeal.

[2]               The appellants confirm that their Fresh Amended Notices of Appeal dated April 11, 2014 had not been filed in accordance with Rule 54 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), SOR/90-688a. This would in itself be a sufficient basis to strike them.

[3]               As to the striking of the prior Notices of Appeal, particularly the Amended Notices of Appeal dated June 25, 2013, we are of the view and the Crown agrees that there was no basis to strike them (Brown v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2014 FCA 301). The June 25, 2013 Amended Notices of Appeal only raise two issues, namely, the assessment of penalties under subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985 c. 1 (5th Supp.) as amended and whether the 2006 and 2007 reassessments are statute barred.

[4]               Accordingly, the appeal will be allowed in part as follows:

a)    The Order of the Tax Court of Canada will be amended to read: The Fresh Amended Notices of Appeal are struck.

b)    The rest of the Order including the portion dealing with costs is rescinded.

c)    The appeals before the Tax Court of Canada will be reinstated based on the June 25, 2013 Amended Notices of Appeal and the replies dated September 30, 2013.

d)   The appellants shall each be entitled to one half of the one set of costs granted for these two appeals.

[5]               Although these two appeals have not been consolidated, they raise the same issue and were dealt with together in the Tax Court of Canada. Thus, these Reasons will apply to both appeals and a copy thereof will be placed on each file (the original being placed in A-312-14).

"Johanne Gauthier"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Dockets:

A-312-14 AND A-313-14

APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DIANE CAMPBELL OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA, DATED JUNE 9, 2014, DOCKET NUMBERS 2012-4740(IT)G AND 2012-4742(IT)G

DOCKET:

A-312-14

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

JOHN DI MAURO v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

AND DOCKET:

A-313-14

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

DEBORA DO COUTO v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

September 28, 2015

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

GAUTHIER J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Joel Sumner

 

For The Appellant

 

Rishma Bhimji

H. Annette Evans

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Joel Sumner

Barrister and Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Appellant

 

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.