Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20150929


Docket: A-377-13

Citation: 2015 FCA 210

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

ALEXANDER DI MAURO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 29, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 29, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.

 


Date: 20150929


Docket: A-377-13

Citation: 2015 FCA 210

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

ALEXANDER DI MAURO

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 29, 2015).

WEBB J.A.

[1]               Alexander Di Mauro appeals the Orders of Campbell, J. of the Tax Court of Canada striking out his Fresh Notices of Appeal dated May 22, 2013 and his Further Fresh Notices of Appeal dated October 16, 2013 for Tax Court Numbers 2012-3399(IT)I and 2012-4035(IT)G that he had filed in relation to assessments or reassessments under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), (the Act).

[2]               The Appellant confirmed at the hearing of this appeal that he is now restricting his appeal to the striking of the parts of his notices of appeal related to the assessment of penalties under subsection 163(2) of the Act.

[3]               We are of the view and the crown agrees that there was no basis to strike the parts of the notices of appeal that are related to the assessment of penalties under subsection 163(2) of the Act (Ian E. Brown v. The Queen, 2014 FCA 301, [2014] F.C.J. No. 1302).

[4]               Accordingly, Mr. Di Mauro’s appeal will be allowed, with costs to the Respondent in the amount of $500, and his appeals before the Tax Court of Canada will be reinstated but only with respect to the issue of whether penalties under subsection 163(2) of the Act should have been assessed.

[5]               Since the Further Fresh Notices of Appeal dated October 16, 2013 replaced the Fresh Notices of Appeal dated May 22, 2013, only the Further Fresh Notices of Appeal dated October 16, 2013 will be addressed. Thus the Orders of the Tax Court Judge will be amended to read as follows:

a)      Those parts of the Further Fresh Notices of Appeal dated October 16, 2013 for Tax Court Numbers 2012-3399(IT)I and 2012-4035(IT)G that do not relate to the assessment of penalties under subsection 163(2) of the Act are struck; and

b)      Mr. Di Mauro shall pay costs to the Respondent in the amount of $500 in respect to both appeals: 2012-4035(IT)G and 2012-3399(IT)I.

"Wyman W. Webb"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-377-13

APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE CAMPBELL OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA, DATED OCTOBER 25, 2013, DOCKET NUMBERS 2012-4035(IT)G AND 2012-3399(IT)I

STYLE OF CAUSE:

ALEXANDER DI MAURO v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

September 29, 2015

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

WEBB J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Alexander Di Mauro

 

For The Appellant

 

H. Annette Evans

Rishma Bhimji

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Self-represented

 

For The Appellant

 

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.