Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20150914


Docket: A-450-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 193

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

PÉPINIÈRE A. MASSÉ INC.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on September 14, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 14, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

 


Date: 20150914


Docket: A-450-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 193

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

PÉPINIÈRE A. MASSÉ INC.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 14, 2015)

NADON J.A.

[1]               Despite Mr. Côté’s very able argument and despite our sympathy for the appellant given how difficult it is to manage the hiring of seasonal staff, we are not satisfied that our intervention is warranted.

[2]               Specifically, it is our opinion that the evidence on the record does not support any of the appellant’s arguments.

[3]               Consequently, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

“M. Nadon”

J.A.

Certified true translation

François Brunet, Revisor


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

A-450-14

(Appeal from the order by the Honourable Justice Brent Paris of the Tax Court of Canada dated September 12, 2014, in docket No. 2011-3900(GST)G.)

STYLE OF CAUSE:

PÉPINIÈRE A. MASSÉ INC. v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Montréal, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:

September 14, 2015

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Louis-Frédérick Côté

For the appellant

Josée Fournier

For the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Spiegel, Sohmer, Inc.

Montréal, Quebec

For the appellant

Larivière, Meunier

Montréal, Quebec

For the respondent

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.