Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010905

Docket: A-652-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 258

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DESJARDINS J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                 PETAR MARKOVIC ON HIS BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF

HIS SPOUSE AND ON BEHALF OF HIS DEFENDANTS MIKLA

MARKOVIC, GORAN MARKOVIC AND BOBAN

MARKOVIC

                                                                                                                                                       Appellants

                                                                                 and

                                                  ABTA SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED,

TRADE FORTUNE INC. S.A.;

                                                                                                                                                    Respondents

and

THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN

THE VESSEL "FLARE";

THE VESSEL "FLARE" AND/OR THE PROCEEDS OF

ANY CLAIMS UPON POLICIES OF INSURANCE

Third Party

                                           Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 5, 2001.

                   Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 5, 2001.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                           NOËL J.A.


Date: 200100905

Docket: A-652-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 258

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DESJARDINS J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

PETAR MARKOVIC ON HIS BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF

HIS SPOUSE AND ON BEHALF OF HIS DEFENDANTS MIKLA

MARKOVIC, GORAN MARKOVIC AND BOBAN

MARKOVIC

                                                                                                                                                       Appellants

                                                                                 and

                                                  ABTA SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED,

TRADE FORTUNE INC. S.A.;

                                                                                                                                                    Respondents

and

THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN

THE VESSEL "FLARE";

THE VESSEL "FLARE" AND/OR THE PROCEEDS OF

ANY CLAIMS UPON POLICIES OF INSURANCE

Third Party

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                           (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario,

on September 5, 2001.)


NOËL J.A.

[1]                 We are of the view that this appeal should be allowed. Paragraph 2 of the Rule 90 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 allowed the Prothonotary to grant the order that he gave and the motions Judge erred in setting it aside.

[2]                 The appeal will be allowed, the decision of the motions Judge will be set aside and, rendering the decision which the motions Judge ought to have rendered, the appeal from the order of the Prothonotary will be dismissed with costs here and before the motions Judge.

                  "Marc Noël"                    

J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.