Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20030626

Docket: A-168-03

Citation: 2003 FCA 290

CORAM:        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                                     INCO LIMITED

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                     Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 2003.

             Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 2003.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.


Date: 20030626

Docket: A-168-03

Citation: 2003 FCA 290

CORAM:        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                                     INCO LIMITED

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

             (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 2003)

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.


[1]                 This is an appeal against an interlocutory order by Bell J.T.C.C. whereby he concluded that the loss determination issue, arising in a broader appeal by Inco Ltd. in the Tax Court of Canada, raised a question of law that is properly determinable, in advance of the hearing, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules. The loss determination issue refers to a letter from the Minister, dated July 4, 1997, informing the respondent as to the amount of non-capital losses available to it for application against taxable income in future years. The debated question in this respect is whether that letter amounts at law to a Determination and a Notice of Determination of the respondent's non-capital losses under the Income Tax Act.

[2]                 We are satisfied that the learned Tax Court Judge, in reaching the conclusion that he did, judicially exercised the discretion conferred upon him by Rule 58. We see no error in his understanding and application of the principles governing a preliminary adjudication upon a question of law.

[3]                 The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

(Sgd.) "Gilles Létourneau"

J.A.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL                                                    

                             NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-168-03                       

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Her Majesty the Queen v. INCO Limited

                                                                                  

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Vancouver, B.C.

DATE OF HEARING:                       June 26, 2003                 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: LÉTOURNEAU, SHARLOW, MALONE JJ.A.

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LÉTOURNEAU, J.A.     

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Luther P. Chambers &                                                            FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. George Boyd Aitken                                                              

Mr. Alnasir Meghji &                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT

Mr. Gerald Grenon

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Morris Rosenberg                                                                  FOR THE APPELLANT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                                            

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP                                                     FOR THE RESPONDENT

Toronto, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.