Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20030603

Docket: A-596-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 245

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act, arising from a complaint pursuant to s. 29(1)(a) of the Privacy Act., R.S., 1985, c. P-21,

against Canada Post Corporation for contravening s. 7 of the Privacy Act;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act

arising from the illegality of parts of the Collective Agreement signed by Canada Post Corporation on February 28, 2000, contravening article 5.01 regarding the age discrimination provisions, of said Collective Agreement;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act arising from the illegality of parts of the Collective Agreement signed by Canada Post Corporation on February 28, 2000, contravening s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), 17(2)(d) & 48 of the Federal Court Act arising from the contravening s. 7 of the Privacy Act by Canada Post Corporation and therefore contravening sections 3(a) & 10 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act S.C. 1990,

c. 8, s. 21, by Canada Post Corporation;

BETWEEN:

                                                                ROBERT LAVIGNE

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                    CANADA POST CORPORATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent


                                             Heard at Montreal, Quebec, on May 29, 2003.

                                     Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 3, 2003.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                          LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                                                                                                                                                     NOËL J.A.


Date: 20030603

Docket: A-596-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 245

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act, arising from a complaint pursuant to s. 29(1)(a) of the Privacy Act., R.S., 1985, c. P-21,

against Canada Post Corporation for contravening s. 7 of the Privacy Act;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act

arising from the illegality of parts of the Collective Agreement signed by Canada Post Corporation on February 28, 2000, contravening article 5.01 regarding the age discrimination provisions, of said Collective Agreement;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), (2)(b) & 48 of the Federal Court Act arising from the illegality of parts of the Collective Agreement signed by Canada Post Corporation on February 28, 2000, contravening s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

In the Matter of an action pursuant to s. 17(1), 17(2)(d) & 48 of the Federal Court Act arising from the contravening s. 7 of the Privacy Act by Canada Post Corporation and therefore contravening sections 3(a) & 10 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act S.C. 1990,

c. 8, s. 21, by Canada Post Corporation;

BETWEEN:

                                                                ROBERT LAVIGNE

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                    CANADA POST CORPORATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent


                                                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

[1]                 I am satisfied that this appeal should be dismissed. The appellant alleges a misuse of personal information in violation of the Privacy Act as a result of the application of a seniority tie-breaker clause in the collective agreement. Judge Tremblay-Lamer made no error when she endorsed the conclusion reached by Prothonotary Morneau that a grievance arbitrator had exclusive jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the parties and, therefore, that the Federal Court - Trial Division lacked jurisdiction to hear the appellant's action.

[2]                 I would dismiss the appeal with costs.

                                                                                                                                         "Gilles Létourneau"                

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.

"I agree.

Alice Desjardins J.A."

"I agree

Marc Noël J.A."


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-596-02

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           ROBERT LAVIGNE v. CANADA POST CORPORATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montreal (Quebec)

DATE OF HEARING:                       May 29, 2003

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                      DESJARDINS J.A.

NOËL J.A.

DATED:                                                June 3, 2003

APPEARANCES:

MR. ROBERT LAVIGNE                                                           FOR HIMSELF

MR. MARC SANTERRE                                                            FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

JODOIN, SANTERRE                                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

MONTREAL, QUEBEC

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.