Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011121

Docket: A-1-00

A-2-00

A-8-00

A-9-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 353

CORAM:             STRAYER J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

Docket: A-1-00

BETWEEN:

         DANNY MOSS

      Applicant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-2-00

BETWEEN:

         DANNY MOSS

      Appellant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent


Docket: A-8-00

BETWEEN:

ROCHELLE MOSS

      Appellant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-9-00

BETWEEN:

ROCHELLE MOSS

      Applicant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

          Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on November 20, 2001

         Judgment delivered at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on November 21, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:     SHARLOW J.A.


Date: 20011121

Docket: A-1-00

A-2-00

A-8-00

A-9-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 353

CORAM:             STRAYER J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

Docket: A-1-00

BETWEEN:

         DANNY MOSS

      Applicant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-2-00

BETWEEN:

         DANNY MOSS

      Appellant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent


Docket: A-8-00

BETWEEN:

ROCHELLE MOSS

      Appellant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-9-00

BETWEEN:

ROCHELLE MOSS

      Applicant

                 and

                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

SHARLOW J.A.

[1]                 We have concluded, notwithstanding the able submissions of counsel for the appellants and the applicants, that the Tax Court Judge made no error that warrants the intervention of this Court.


[2]                 First, there was evidence on which the Tax Court Judge could conclude that the properties that the appellants claimed to be their principal residence were properties acquired as inventory. The principal residence exemption applies only with respect to capital gains and could have no application to the properties in question.

[3]                 Second, it was open to the Tax Court Judge to reject all or any part of the evidence relating to building costs and, having done so, to determine the costs as he did. We find no palpable or overriding error in his findings of fact in that regard.

[4]                 Third, the evidence falls far short of establishing that the money deposited to the bank account of Ms. Moss was subject to any trust obligations.

[5]                 These appeals and applications for judicial review will be dismissed with costs.

                       "Karen R. Sharlow"            

                 J.A.

Winnipeg, Manitoba

November 21, 2001


     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                          A-1-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          Danny Moss v. Her Majesty the Queen,

Rochelle Moss v. Her Majesty the Queen

PLACE OF HEARING:                          Winnipeg, Manitoba

DATE OF HEARING:                          November 20, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : SHARLOW J.A.

DATED:                          November 21, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Mr. A.J. Stacey                         for the Applicant/Appellant

Mr. Jeff Pniowsky                         for the Respondent

Department of Justice

301-310 Broadway

Winnipeg, MB    R3C 0S6

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Thompson Dorfman Sweatman                         for the Applicant/Appellant

Barristers & Solicitors

Toronto Dominion Centre

2200-201 Portage Avenue

Winnipeg, Manitoba    R3B 3L3

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                          for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.