Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20031104

Docket: A-251-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 413

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                               SONIA DION ET AL.1

                                                                                                                                                      Applicants

                                                                                 and

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                    Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2003.

                   Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2003

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:                                                            DÉCARY J.A.

_______________________

1 List of forty-six (46) applications for judicial review of this group


Date: 20031104

Docket: A-251-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 413

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                               SONIA DION ET AL.1

                                                                                                                                                      Applicants

                                                                                 and

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                    (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2003)

DÉCARY J.A.

[1]                 We are satisfied that the umpire asked himself the right questions, that he did not err in defining the applicable standards of law and that he did not apply these standards unreasonably.

_______________________

1 List of forty-six (46) applications for judicial review of this group


[2]                 The Board of Referees was entitled to find that there had been no interruption of earnings within the meaning of subsection 37(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, in that the evidence in the record supported the finding that there had not really been a separation from employment and/or that there had not been non-payment of earnings.

[3]                 Under the circumstances, the intervention of the umpire would have been unwarranted.

[4]                 This application for judicial review as well as the 45 applications associated with it will therefore be dismissed with costs.

[5]                 The parties agreed at the hearing that the costs for the memorandum and the oral arguments would be determined on the basis of a single application, but that they would include the costs of preparing each of the other records.

[6]                 A copy of these reasons and a certified copy of the judgment will be placed in all of the other files in lieu of the original.

        "Robert Décary"       

J.A.

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                          SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                                                                                                       

DOCKET:                                                                  A-251-02

(APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION BY THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION DATED MARCH 1, 2002 IN CUB 53776).

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                  SONIA DION ET AL.

and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

PLACE OF HEARING:                                            Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                              November 4, 2003

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:        DÉCARY, NOËL, NADON JJ.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:             DÉCARY J.A.

APPEARANCES:

William De Merchant                                               

FOR THE APPLICANTS

Pauline Leroux

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                                                                                                                  

OUELLET, NADON & ASSOCIÉS

Montréal, Quebec

FOR THE APPLICANTS

MORRIS ROSENBERG

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec

FOR THE RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.