Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

Date: 20030203

 

                                                                                                                                 Docket: A‑22‑02

 

Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 58

 

 

CORAM:       DESJARDINS J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NADON J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

ANTHONY JURAK

 

Appellant

 

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, February 3, 2003.

 

Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, February 3, 2003.

 

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:                                              LÉTOURNEAU J.A.


 

 

 

 

Date: 20030203

 

                                                                                                                                 Docket: A‑22‑02

 

Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 58

 

 

CORAM:       DESJARDINS J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NADON J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

ANTHONY JURAK

 

Appellant

 

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

Respondent

 

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Pronounced from the bench at Montréal, Quebec,

February 3, 2003)

 

 

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

 


[1]        Notwithstanding the laudable efforts of Mr. Côté, we have not been persuaded that Her Honour Judge Lamarre‑Proulx of the Tax Court of Canada misdirected herself in her interpretation of section 160 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985 (5th Supp.), c. 1, as amended, and in her application to the facts of this case when she concluded, in paragraph 38 of her decision, that “[translation] the transferee may himself become the transferor, subject to the application of subsection 160(1) of the Act if, at the time of the second transfer, he is himself a tax debtor, either ex proprio motu or as a joint and several debtor with the first transferor.”

 

[2]        Counsel for the respondent having conceded that in the circumstances the amount of the assessment in dispute, $144,222, does not generate interest, it was unnecessary to hear the parties on this second ground of appeal.

 

[3]        The appeal will be dismissed with costs and it will be declared that the amount of the assessment in dispute, $144,222, does not bear interest.

 

 

 

                      “Gilles Létourneau”

Judge

 

 

Certified true translation

 

 

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.


              FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

 

 

Date: 20030203

 

                                                         Docket: A‑22‑02

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

ANTHONY JURAK

 

Appellant

 

and

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

 

 


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

FILE NO:                               A‑22‑02

 

CORAM:                               DESJARDINS J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NADON J.A.

 

STYLE:                                   ANTHONY JURAK

 

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:        Montréal, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:           February 3, 2003

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Létourneau J.A.

 

DATED:                                 February 3, 2003

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Louis‑Frédérick Côté                                                   FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Valérie Tardif                                                                FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Mendelsohn Rosentzveig Schacter                                FOR THE APPELLANT

Montréal, Quebec

 

Morris Rosenberg                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.