BETWEEN:
and
COMPLAINTS COMMISSION
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 16, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 16, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
Docket: A-562-08
Citation: 2009 FCA 205
CORAM: SHARLOW J.A.
LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
RYER J.A.
BETWEEN:
JENNIFER PURDY
Appellant
and
MILITARY POLICE
COMPLAINTS COMMISSION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 16, 2009)
[1] We appreciate the appellant’s laudable efforts to seek improvement to the military police investigation process while she also seeks a remedy for what she perceives as an injustice to her.
[2] However, we are of the view that the appeal must be dismissed. We are not persuaded, on the facts of this matter, that the motion judge’s discretionary decision, refusing the request for an extension of time within which to bring an application for judicial review, discloses a misapprehension of the facts or an error of law.
[3] The respondent did not request costs and none will be awarded.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-562-08
(APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF JUSTICE HARRINGTON OF THE FEDERAL COURT, DATED NOVEMBER 6, 2008, DOCKET 08-T-49
STYLE OF CAUSE: Jennifer Purdy v. Military Police Complaints Commission
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: June 16, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (SHARLOW, LAYDEN-STEVENSON, RYER JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE APPELLANT/
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Ottawa, Ontario |
FOR THE APPELLANT/
|
Military Police Complaints Commission Ottawa, Ontario |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|