CANADA |
Cour d'appel fédérale |
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
BDR MACHINERY LTD.
Appellants
REALSEARCH INC. and
DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
Respondents
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 12, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 12, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PELLETIER J.A.
CANADA |
Cour d'appel fédérale |
Date: 20091112
Docket: A-103-09
Citation: 2009 FCA 327
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
VALON KONE BRUNETTE LTD. and
BDR MACHINERY LTD.
Appellants
and
REALSEARCH INC. and
DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 12, 2009)
PELLETIER J.A._
[1] We are all of the view that the appellants have not met the burden of showing that the order under appeal is the product of “the clearest case of the misuse of judicial discretion” as was said in L’Hirondelle v. Canada, 2001 FCA 399 at paragraph 4.
[2] There was evidence to support the judge’s conclusion that Realsearch Inc. had assets available to satisfy the amount of costs claimed. We are also satisfied that the judge did not take into account any assets owned by Dingwall’s Machinery and Supply Ltd.
[3] As a result, there is no basis for our intervention. The appeal should be dismissed with costs.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-103-09
(APPEAL FROM AN AMENDED ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIMON NOËL DATED FEBRUARY 16, 2009, DOCKET NO. T-1300-02)
STYLE OF CAUSE: VALON KONE BRUNETTE LTD. and BDR MACHINERY LTD. v. REALSEARCH INC. and DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: November 12, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, PELLETIER & TRUDEL JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: PELLETIER J.A.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Dimock Stratton LLP Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Ottawa, Ontario |
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
|