BETWEEN:
and
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RYER J.A.
Docket: A-340-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 354
CORAM: SHARLOW J.A.
RYER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
GARY PENNEY
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009)
[1] Despite the spirited efforts of counsel for the applicant, we are not persuaded that the Umpire, in holding the decision of the Board, made any error that warrants our intervention. Accordingly, the application will be dismissed with costs.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-340-07
(APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AN UMPIRE’S DECISION (CUB 68224) DATED APRIL 30, 2007)
STYLE OF CAUSE: Gary Penney Applicant
v.
Attorney General of Canada
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: December 2, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (Sharlow, Ryer, Trudel JJ.A)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Ryer J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
South Dildo, NL
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
Deputy Attorney General of Canada |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|