Tax Court of Canada Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021212

Dockets: 2000-2597-IT-G,

2000-2598-IT-G

BETWEEN:

WILLIAM G. GREEN,

JENNY GREEN,

Applicants,

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

Reasons for Order

Little, J.

FACTS

[1]            This is an application for a determination of a question of law pursuant to Rule 58(1)(a) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure).

[2]            The Applicants request that the Court determine the question of law in favour of the Applicants that paragraph 245(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") cannot apply their 1995 taxation year and directing that it is not an issue to be determined in these appeals.

[3]            In their Notice of Motion the Applicants ask, in the alternative, that the Court strike out paragraphs 8(d) and 11(3) and 11(5) of the Minister's Reply as being improper and that the Respondent be enjoined from relying upon the new basis that there is an avoidance transaction within the meaning of paragraph 245(3)(b) of the Act since to do so would indirectly permit the Respondent to bypass the limitation period of subsection 152(4) of the Act.

[4]            In the further alternative the Applicants ask in their Notice of Motion for the Court to confirm that it has no jurisdiction to grant any relief to the Respondent upon the basis that there is an avoidance transaction within the meaning of paragraph 245(3)(b) (series of transactions) since to do so would indirectly permit the Respondent to bypass the limitation period of subsection 152(4) of the Act.

ISSUE:

[5]            Should the Court issue a ruling under Rule 58(1)(a) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules?

ANALYSIS

[6]            Rule 58(1)(a) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) calls for the determination of a question at law. The jurisprudence stated that the question must be a "pure question of law" i.e. there must be no dispute on the relevant and material facts. In this situation since the parties have not agreed upon all of the relevant facts it is not appropriate to issue a ruling under Rule 58[1].

[7]            The applications are dismissed.

Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 12th day of December 2002.

"L.M. Little"

J.T.C.C.

COURT FILE NO.:                                                 2000-2597(IT)G

                                                                                               

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                               William G. Green and

                                                                                                Her Majesty the Queen

PLACE OF HEARING:                                         Edmonton, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                           October 16, 2002

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      The Honourable Judge L.M. Little

DATE OF JUDGMENT:                                       December , 2002

APPEARANCES:

Counsel for the Applicant: Neil W. Nichols

Counsel for the Respondent:              J.E. (Ted) Fulcher

COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For the Applicant:                

Name:                                Neil W. Nichols

Firm:                  Nichols & Company

For the Respondent:                             Morris Rosenberg

                                                                                Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                                                                                Ottawa, CanadaCOURT FILE NO.:                                     2000-2598(IT)G

                                                                                               

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                               Jenny Green and

                                                                                                Her Majesty the Queen

PLACE OF HEARING:                                         Edmonton, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                           October 16, 2002

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      The Honourable Judge L.M. Little

DATE OF JUDGMENT:                                       December , 2002

APPEARANCES:

Counsel for the Applicant: Neil W. Nichols

Counsel for the Respondent:              J.E. (Ted) Fulcher

COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For the Applicant:                

Name:                                Neil W. Nichols

Firm:                  Nichols & Company

For the Respondent:                             Morris Rosenberg

                                                                                Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                                                                                Ottawa, Canada

2000-2597(IT)G

BETWEEN:

WILLIAM G. GREEN,

Applicant,

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

Application heard on common evidence with the application of Jenny Green (2000-2598(IT)G) on October 16, 2002, at Edmonton, Alberta, by

the Honourable Judge L.M. Little

Appearances

Counsel for the Applicant: Neil W. Nichols

Counsel for the Respondent:              J.E. (Ted) Fulcher

ORDER

The application made under the Income Tax Act for the 1995 taxation year is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Order.

Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 12th day of December 2002.

"L.M. Little"

J.T.C.C.

2000-2598(IT)G

BETWEEN:

JENNY GREEN,

Applicant,

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

Application heard on common evidence with the application of William G. Green (2000-2597(IT)G) on October 16, 2002, at Edmonton, Alberta, by

the Honourable Judge L.M. Little

Appearances

Counsel for the Applicant: Neil W. Nichols

Counsel for the Respondent:              J.E. (Ted) Fulcher

ORDER

The application made under the Income Tax Act for the 1995 taxation year is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Order.

Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 12th day of December 2002.

"L.M. Little"

J.T.C.C.



[1]    Dale et al. v. The Queen 94 DTC 1100

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.