CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
YVES VALLÉE
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on May 27, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on May 27, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
|
CANADA |
Federal Court of Appeal |
Date: 20090527
Docket : A-430-08
Citation: 2009 FCA 176
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BLAIS J.A.
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
YVES VALLÉE
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on May 27, 2009)
[1] We are all of the opinion that the Umpire was not authorized to intervene unless he explained how the decision of the Board of Referees was unreasonable, which he did not do (Attorney General of Canada v. McBride, 2009 FCA 1).
[2] The Umpire simply substituted his assessment of the facts for that of the Board of Referees in his analysis of the requirements of subsection 10(5) of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23, which he could not do.
[3] The application for judicial review will be allowed, the Umpire’s decision set aside and the matter referred back to the Chief Umpire or his delegate for redetermination on the basis that the respondent’s appeal must be dismissed.
[4] The applicant claims no costs.
Certified true translation
Tu-Quynh Trinh
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-430-08
(JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION OF UMPIRE R. J. MARIN, DATED JUNE 30, 2008, FILE NO. CUB 69486A).
STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. YVES VALLÉE
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BLAIS J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
Montréal, Quebec |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|